@Risk

New survey results from Aon eSolutions offer some valuable insight into how the use of risk technology can impact an organization’s risk and data management, as well as the total cost of risk.

For example, according to the survey of more than 400 risk professionals from 57 countries:

• The number one benefit and driving force behind the use of risk technology is accurate and reliable data. Companies use risk management information systems (RMIS) to manage business operations and generated accurate financial information.
• More organizations are now closely tracking return on investment (ROI) for risk technology tools.  The study results revealed that more than 25 percent of those polled expect to save up to $50,000 per year from using risk/insurance and claims technology.
• Compliance is an emerging benefit of using risk management tools.

Based on the survey results, Aon eSolutions identified these top ten benefits of risk technology: (more…)

How will your company find the leadership talent it needs to retain its competitive edge?

Unfortunately, the search may be more difficult than you realize.

Results from a  new study by Deloitte indicate there’s both a growing shortage of executive leadership and evolving regional differences in talent needs around the globe. Consequently, organizations are going to have to invest more in talent priorities and initiatives in order to find the appropriate executive leadership required for continued success.

Here are a few key finding from Deloitte’s new report, Talent Edge 2020: Redrafting Talent Strategies for the Uneven Recovery: (more…)

As The Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend, Apple Inc. is “increasingly finding itself pinched between the promise and perils of doing business in China.”

Last Friday –and for the first time ever –Apple released a comprehensive list of its major suppliers and a detailed report on factory inspections throughout the company’s sprawling supply chain.

In addition, Apple recently became the first technology company accepted by the Fair Labor Association (FLA), an organization that monitors workplace environments worldwide.

These moves come on the heels of stepped-up pressure from activists worldwide. Earlier this month, workers from a Foxconn Technology factory in China waged a large protest that involved threats from some to commit suicide.   (more…)

The US Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) has proposed a set of recommended best practices to help the pharmaceutical industry improve supply chain integrity and reduce risks of counterfeit or mishandled medicines.

Improvements like these are long overdue. As I reported last spring, research from PwC concluded that many pharmaceutical supply chains have suffered from what amounts to benign neglect. As a result, they are inefficient, under-utilized and ill-equipped to cope with new medicines, cost pressures and health reform expectations.

Sure, in today’s global economy relationships between suppliers and other business entities are often opaque and difficult to track, but clearly, it’s time for the pharmaceutical industry to step up to better ensure that medicines can be traced back to their original manufacturer, are not adulterated or counterfeited and are transported to their intended destination with their quality intact.

Too many companies have discovered the hard way that “willful blindness” only increases their culpability in the eyes of Federal agents, regulators who now are cracking down on businesses that aren’t compliant with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

Don’t take that kind of risk. Resolve that this is the year to start better managing your multiple supplier master databases as you monitor and mitigate supplier risk in a global operating arena.

“There is incentive for all players in the pharmaceutical industry—large and small companies, regulators and standards-setting bodies—to come to some agreement on hotbutton issues such as track and trace technology and, at the larger level, to codify what constitutes a solid, universal approach to global supply chain integrity,” said Praveen Tyle, Ph.D., chief science officer for USP.

USP’s proposed standard covers four main areas: (more…)

Results of the 2011 Change in the (Supply) Chain survey show that many Japanese high-tech companies are shifting supply sourcing locations from domestic to other Asian countries, such as South East Asia.

More specifically, the survey, which was conducted by IDC Manufacturing Insights and commissioned by UPS, revealed that:

• The Japanese companies interviewed expect to reduce their domestic supply sourcing by nearly half, from 96 percent to 53 percent in the next three to five years.
• These companies also expect to increase sourcing from Mature Asia Pacific Countries (Thailand, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Singapore) almost threefold, from 9 percent to 24 percent.

The key concern appears to be cost management. More than two-thirds (68.9 percent) of the Japanese companies surveyed cited “reducing total supply chain costs” as the top supply chain priority in the past years. Not surprisingly, cost is also expected to remain one of the top drivers of change in the supply chain in the next three to five years. (more…)